OUR BLOG

Defending against Colorado identity theft and financial exploitation charges often begins with a close look at what prosecutors can actually prove about knowledge, intent, permission, authority, and the movement or use of money and identifying information.

Colorado identity theft can be charged as a class 4 felony, while criminal exploitation of an at-risk person involving $500 or more can be charged as a class 3 felony. Related allegations may also involve possession of financial devices, gathering identity information by deception, possession of identity theft tools, criminal impersonation, theft, forgery, or other financial crimes.

A Denver white collar crime attorney can examine the financial records, communications, account access, alleged permission, and other evidence before accepting the prosecution’s version of how a transaction occurred.

How Colorado Defines Identity Theft

Colorado’s identity theft statute, C.R.S. § 18-5-902, covers several different forms of conduct involving another person’s personal or financial identifying information.

A person can commit felony identity theft by knowingly using another person’s personal identifying information, financial identifying information, or financial device without permission or lawful authority and with the intent to obtain something of value or make a financial payment.

The statute also covers falsely making, completing, altering, or using a written instrument or financial device containing another person’s identifying information with the intent to defraud.

Colorado defines identifying information broadly. Depending on the allegation, it can include a person’s name, date of birth, Social Security number, password, driver’s license number, passport information, biometric information, account numbers, routing numbers, PINs, and other information that can identify a person or access financial resources.

Cases can involve conduct ranging from opening an account or applying for credit using another person’s information to accessing an existing account, obtaining a government document, making payments, or using financial information in some other transaction.

Colorado Identity Theft Penalties and Related Charges

The classification of an identity-related offense depends on exactly what prosecutors allege the person did.

Knowingly using another person’s identifying or financial information without permission or lawful authority to obtain something of value, or falsely creating or altering a document containing another person’s information with intent to defraud, remains a class 4 felony under Colorado law. A class 4 felony generally carries a presumptive prison range of two to six years, along with the possibility of substantial fines.

Colorado law treats some possession-based identity offenses differently. Possessing another person’s identifying information with the intent to use it, or possessing it to apply for credit or obtain certain government documents, can be charged as a class 2 misdemeanor when it involves fewer than three people or financial devices.

The offense can become a class 5 felony when prosecutors allege possession involving the identifying information of three or more people or three or more financial devices.

Other related Colorado offenses can include:

• criminal possession of a financial device;
• criminal possession of an identification document;
• gathering identity information by deception;
• possession of identity theft tools;
• forgery;
• criminal impersonation; and
• theft or other fraud-related charges.

Because the classifications and elements differ, the name attached to an investigation does not necessarily tell you what prosecutors will ultimately charge.

What Counts as Financial Exploitation of an At-Risk Person in Colorado?

Colorado separately criminalizes the exploitation of an at-risk person under C.R.S. § 18-6.5-103.

A person commits criminal exploitation of an at-risk person when the person knowingly uses deception, harassment, intimidation, or undue influence to permanently or temporarily deprive an at-risk person of the use, benefit, or possession of something of value.

Colorado defines an at-risk elder as someone 70 or older. Other categories of at-risk persons are defined separately under Colorado law and can include certain adults with qualifying disabilities.

The value involved can dramatically change the criminal exposure:

• $500 or more: class 3 felony;
• less than $500: class 5 felony.

A class 3 felony ordinarily carries a presumptive prison range of four to 12 years. That makes the alleged value—and how the prosecution calculated it—a significant issue in an exploitation case.

Permission and Authority Can Be Central to the Defense

Not every disputed financial transaction involving another person’s money or identifying information is identity theft or criminal exploitation.

Family financial arrangements can be particularly complicated. A person may have been given access to an account, permission to make purchases, authority to pay expenses, responsibility for managing an older relative’s finances, or rights under a power of attorney or another legal arrangement.

The prosecution may characterize a transaction as unauthorized while the defense has evidence showing that permission existed—or that the accused reasonably believed it existed.

Relevant evidence can include:

• bank and credit card records;
• text messages and emails;
• powers of attorney;
• account authorization documents;
• prior transactions between the parties;
• estate or caregiving records;
• receipts and invoices; and
• witnesses familiar with the financial arrangement.

Those records can be especially important when the dispute involves relatives, caregivers, business partners, employees, or other people who previously had legitimate access to the information or money at issue.

Key Defense Issues in Colorado Identity Theft and Exploitation Cases

Identity theft and financial exploitation cases often turn on individual elements the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt, not simply whether money changed hands.

Important defense questions can include:

• Knowledge and intent: Did the accused knowingly use the information improperly, or did prosecutors infer criminal intent from an otherwise explainable transaction?
• Permission or lawful authority: Did the person have authorization to access the account, information, financial device, or property?
• Intent to defraud: When the charge requires fraudulent intent, what evidence actually establishes that intent?
• Value: In an exploitation case, does the evidence support the value assigned by prosecutors?
• Number of people or devices: Does the evidence actually satisfy a three-or-more threshold that can elevate certain identity-related offenses?
• At-risk status: Does the alleged victim meet the statutory definition required for the particular at-risk-person charge?
• Identity and access: Do digital records, device logs, IP information, signatures, video, or account records reliably establish who performed the transaction?

These cases can involve thousands of pages of financial and electronic records. The defense needs to determine not only what a transaction shows, but also what it does not prove about the person accused of committing it.

Electronic Records Can Become Critical Evidence

Many modern identity theft investigations depend heavily on electronic evidence.

Investigators may review account-login records, device information, IP addresses, email accounts, text messages, online applications, transaction histories, surveillance video, location data, or records obtained from banks and technology companies.

But an account associated with a person does not automatically prove that person performed every transaction connected to it. Shared devices, saved passwords, authorized users, compromised accounts, remote access, and other circumstances can complicate attribution.

A defense investigation may therefore need to examine how the government obtained the digital evidence, whether the records properly connect to the accused, and whether alternative explanations exist for the activity prosecutors rely on.

When Does the Statute of Limitations Begin in a Colorado Identity Theft Case?

Colorado generally provides a three-year limitations period for many felony offenses and an 18-month period for many misdemeanors. However, identity theft and related offenses are subject to an important discovery rule.

Under Colorado’s criminal statute of limitations, the limitations period for identity-theft-related offenses begins when the criminal act is discovered, not necessarily when the underlying transaction occurred.

That means an identity-related investigation may begin well after the conduct prosecutors claim constituted the offense. Determining whether a charge was filed on time may require identifying when prosecutors discovered the alleged criminal conduct and which specific offense and limitations period apply.

How Bank Reports Can Lead to Financial Exploitation Investigations

Financial exploitation investigations frequently begin outside traditional law enforcement. Banks, credit unions, caregivers, medical professionals, and others may identify suspicious transactions and file a report.

Colorado already requires certain professionals to report suspected mistreatment or exploitation involving protected at-risk adults under specified circumstances.

Colorado expanded financial institutions’ role in 2026 through the Adults’ Security and Safeguards from Exploitation in Transactions Act, or ASSET Act, which became effective August 12, 2026.

Under the new law, qualified employees of banks and credit unions have additional duties and authority when they reasonably and in good faith suspect that a vulnerable adult is being financially exploited. Depending on the circumstances, a financial institution may report suspected exploitation and may delay a requested disbursement while it reviews the situation.

A financial institution generally must reach a determination within 90 days after beginning a delay. That period can extend to 180 days if the institution is awaiting completion of a law enforcement or adult protective services investigation.

Those reports can generate bank records, witness statements, account reviews, and referrals to law enforcement before the accused even knows a criminal investigation has begun.

A Financial Dispute Is Not Automatically a Crime

One of the most important distinctions in these cases is the difference between a disputed financial decision and criminal conduct.

A family member may disagree with how money was spent. An account holder may later dispute permission that was previously given. Business partners may disagree over who had authority to move funds. A caregiver may have made purchases the prosecution later characterizes as personal rather than necessary.

Those facts can create serious disputes, but criminal liability still requires prosecutors to prove the statutory elements of the charged offense.

The defense should reconstruct the financial relationship and the history behind the transactions instead of relying on an isolated bank statement and assuming it tells the whole story.

Talk to a Denver Identity Theft Lawyer About the Evidence

At the Law Office of Jacob E. Martinez, defending an identity theft or financial exploitation allegation can start with the records behind the accusation: account statements, financial devices, communications, authorization documents, digital evidence, alleged value, reporting history, and the prosecution’s theory of intent.

Our attorneys handle white-collar and fraud charges as part of the firm’s broader Colorado criminal defense practice. We can also examine whether additional allegations—such as theft, forgery, criminal impersonation, or financial-device offenses—change the potential exposure or defense strategy.

If you have received a bank notice, been contacted by an investigator, learned that an account has been frozen, or been charged with identity theft or exploitation, consider getting legal advice before making statements about the transactions.

Contact the Law Office of Jacob E. Martinez or call 720-246-6700 for a free consultation about a Colorado identity theft, financial exploitation, or related criminal charge.