Misuse of a Wireless Telephone while Driving in Colorado – ‘Texting and Driving’
Misuse of a Wireless Telephone – 42-4-239
Texting and driving or being on the phone while driving is a relatively recent phenomenon that has unfortunately proved to be lethal, not only for the individual using their phone, but also for other individuals on and around the roadway. The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration reported that 2,841 people died as the result of distracted driving.
Because using a phone while driving, or “Misuse of a Wireless Telephone” as the statue calls it, is a relatively new offense, the legislature had to start by including definitions These definitions are important, because the statute later provides times in which it is proper for a person to use their cell phone based on these definitions.
First, the statute makes clear that a person under the age of eighteen shall not use a cellphone at all unless one of the specified exceptions applies.
Seconds, no one is permitted to text (or use a similar messaging service) while driving unless one of the specified exceptions applies.
The next section outlines when a person of any age may use a cellphone: “to contact a public safety entity” or “during an emergency.” Here, the definition section applies to define what an emergency is – essentially, if a person is in fear for their life or safety, believes a criminal act may be perpetrated against them, or is reporting an emergency situation or reckless driver. In addition, the statute makes clear that a person pulled over on the side of the road may use their cell phone for any purpose, because it specifically excludes being pulled over from the required “operating a motor vehicle”.
Section 6 of the statute establishes what is required for a person to be found guilty of misusing a cellphone. For a person under 18, an officer observing a person using their cellphone is sufficient proof to find that person guilty. However, for a person above 18, the officer must observe the person texting (or manually entering data) and must observe that this behavior was coupled with careless or imprudent manner. In other words, the mere act of texting is not sufficient to uphold a conviction.
If a person if convicted of misuse of a telephone, it is a class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense, unless a person is injured as a result of the misuse. If that occurs, then it is a class 1 misdemeanor traffic offense.
If you are charged with misuse of a telephone, you may have a defense that applies to your case. Contact our experienced Denver traffic attorneys today to get a free consultation.
Defending against Colorado identity theft and financial exploitation charges often begins with a close look at what prosecutors can actually prove about knowledge, intent, permission, authority, and the movement or use of money and identifying information.
Colorado identity theft can be charged as a class 4 felony, while criminal exploitation of an at-risk person involving $500 or more can be charged as a class 3 felony. Related allegations may also involve possession of financial devices, gathering identity information by deception, [...]
There is no single statute of limitations that applies to every Colorado sexual assault or sex crime allegation. Depending on the exact charge, the alleged victim’s age, when the conduct allegedly occurred, whether DNA evidence identifies a suspect, when the offense was reported, and whether the accused spent time outside Colorado, prosecutors may have 20 years, a different statutory period, or no time limit at all.
Those distinctions matter most when an allegation surfaces years or even decades after the [...]
Extradition is about where a criminal case will be handled—not whether the person is guilty. If someone is arrested in Colorado on another state’s warrant, the immediate questions are usually whether to waive extradition, whether bail is available, how long the process may take, and what can actually be challenged before the person is returned.
The same issue can run in the other direction. A person may be arrested in another state because Colorado issued the warrant. In that situation, [...]
