Misuse of a Wireless Telephone while Driving in Colorado – ‘Texting and Driving’
Misuse of a Wireless Telephone – 42-4-239
Texting and driving or being on the phone while driving is a relatively recent phenomenon that has unfortunately proved to be lethal, not only for the individual using their phone, but also for other individuals on and around the roadway. The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration reported that 2,841 people died as the result of distracted driving.
Because using a phone while driving, or “Misuse of a Wireless Telephone” as the statue calls it, is a relatively new offense, the legislature had to start by including definitions These definitions are important, because the statute later provides times in which it is proper for a person to use their cell phone based on these definitions.
First, the statute makes clear that a person under the age of eighteen shall not use a cellphone at all unless one of the specified exceptions applies.
Seconds, no one is permitted to text (or use a similar messaging service) while driving unless one of the specified exceptions applies.
The next section outlines when a person of any age may use a cellphone: “to contact a public safety entity” or “during an emergency.” Here, the definition section applies to define what an emergency is – essentially, if a person is in fear for their life or safety, believes a criminal act may be perpetrated against them, or is reporting an emergency situation or reckless driver. In addition, the statute makes clear that a person pulled over on the side of the road may use their cell phone for any purpose, because it specifically excludes being pulled over from the required “operating a motor vehicle”.
Section 6 of the statute establishes what is required for a person to be found guilty of misusing a cellphone. For a person under 18, an officer observing a person using their cellphone is sufficient proof to find that person guilty. However, for a person above 18, the officer must observe the person texting (or manually entering data) and must observe that this behavior was coupled with careless or imprudent manner. In other words, the mere act of texting is not sufficient to uphold a conviction.
If a person if convicted of misuse of a telephone, it is a class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense, unless a person is injured as a result of the misuse. If that occurs, then it is a class 1 misdemeanor traffic offense.
If you are charged with misuse of a telephone, you may have a defense that applies to your case. Contact our experienced Denver traffic attorneys today to get a free consultation.
A deferred judgment and sentence allows a first-time offender in Colorado to plead guilty, complete a period of court supervision, and then have the guilty plea withdrawn and the charge dismissed permanently. For someone facing their first criminal charge, this is often the best available outcome.
At the Law Office of Jacob Martinez, our Denver criminal defense team has negotiated deferred judgment agreements in Colorado courts since 2014.
How a Deferred Judgment and Sentence Works in Colorado
Eyewitness testimony is undeniably a powerful form of evidence in criminal cases. However, there have been studies showing it is also one of the leading causes of wrongful convictions in Denver and across the United States. This suggests that human memory is not perfect and that some situations can lead to errors in identification.
In Denver, cases involving eyewitness misidentification span a wide range of crimes. You must defend against wrongful convictions, which requires a detailed review of the circumstances [...]
Violating a Colorado protection order can trigger a new criminal charge and contempt proceedings in the same court, and any new sentence must be served back-to-back with the sentence you were already facing, not at the same time. That means a single phone call, text message, or chance encounter can double your exposure while you are still on bond or probation. Denver criminal defense attorneys at the Law Office of Jacob Martinez have defended clients against these charges across Colorado [...]
