Misuse of a Wireless Telephone while Driving in Colorado – ‘Texting and Driving’
Misuse of a Wireless Telephone – 42-4-239
Texting and driving or being on the phone while driving is a relatively recent phenomenon that has unfortunately proved to be lethal, not only for the individual using their phone, but also for other individuals on and around the roadway. The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration reported that 2,841 people died as the result of distracted driving.
Because using a phone while driving, or “Misuse of a Wireless Telephone” as the statue calls it, is a relatively new offense, the legislature had to start by including definitions These definitions are important, because the statute later provides times in which it is proper for a person to use their cell phone based on these definitions.
First, the statute makes clear that a person under the age of eighteen shall not use a cellphone at all unless one of the specified exceptions applies.
Seconds, no one is permitted to text (or use a similar messaging service) while driving unless one of the specified exceptions applies.
The next section outlines when a person of any age may use a cellphone: “to contact a public safety entity” or “during an emergency.” Here, the definition section applies to define what an emergency is – essentially, if a person is in fear for their life or safety, believes a criminal act may be perpetrated against them, or is reporting an emergency situation or reckless driver. In addition, the statute makes clear that a person pulled over on the side of the road may use their cell phone for any purpose, because it specifically excludes being pulled over from the required “operating a motor vehicle”.
Section 6 of the statute establishes what is required for a person to be found guilty of misusing a cellphone. For a person under 18, an officer observing a person using their cellphone is sufficient proof to find that person guilty. However, for a person above 18, the officer must observe the person texting (or manually entering data) and must observe that this behavior was coupled with careless or imprudent manner. In other words, the mere act of texting is not sufficient to uphold a conviction.
If a person if convicted of misuse of a telephone, it is a class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense, unless a person is injured as a result of the misuse. If that occurs, then it is a class 1 misdemeanor traffic offense.
If you are charged with misuse of a telephone, you may have a defense that applies to your case. Contact our experienced Denver traffic attorneys today to get a free consultation.
Hate crime enhancements allow Colorado prosecutors to increase criminal penalties. A misdemeanor assault could become a felony with years in prison if bias motivation is proven. These enhancements don’t require explicit hatred; prosecutors just need to show that prejudice based on protected characteristics played a role.
At the Law Office of Jacob Martinez, our Denver criminal defense attorneys defend clients statewide, challenging subjective or ambiguous evidence. Many alleged “proofs” of bias have reasonable alternative explanations.
In criminal cases across Denver, CO, DNA evidence is presented as powerful proof linking a defendant to a crime scene, victim, or weapon. While DNA analysis can be highly reliable when performed correctly, it is not infallible. Criminal defense attorneys at the Law Office of Jacob Martinez frequently challenge DNA evidence on multiple grounds to create reasonable doubt or even exclude it entirely from trial. This is especially relevant in Denver, where many cases rely on testing from the Colorado [...]
Police body camera footage has become one of the most influential types of evidence in Colorado criminal cases. What officers’ records can support their account or expose inconsistencies that benefit your defense. Understanding how to obtain and use this footage is essential when facing charges.
At the Law Office of Jacob Martinez, our Denver criminal defense attorney team pursues body camera footage in every case where it exists. We know how to analyze video evidence, identify improper police conduct, and [...]
